You can republish this story for free using the form below. Return to article
Cipher is proud to make our journalism free for all to read and republish. Unless otherwise noted, you may republish our articles for free as long as you abide by our Creative Commons license and the following terms:
- Credit Cipher and any co-reporting partners. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication(s).” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Cipher.” You must link the word “Cipher” to the original URL of the story.
- If you’re republishing online, you must link to the URL of this story on ciphernews.com, include all of the links from our story and use our PixelPing tag.
- If you use canonical metadata, please use the Cipher URL. For more information about canonical metadata, refer to this Google SEO link.
- You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”
- For questions or help, please email news@ciphernews.com with the subject line: “Republishing.”
<header><h1>Why we need a more ambitious global energy target</h1><a href="/guest-author/" rel="author"></a><span class="title">Guest Author</span><time rel="pubdate" datetime="2024-02-26T00:00:00-05:00">Feb 26</time></header><p><span data-contrast="auto">Everyone needs modern energy to reach their full potential. Every economy needs low-cost reliable energy at scale to be competitive and to create well-paying jobs. That’s why the world has committed to achieving universal energy access. But this laudable global goal won’t deliver the expected benefits if we don’t update the way we track progress.</span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Without a new approach, we will leave billions of people behind — and drive an even bigger wedge between rich and poor nations over climate policy. That’s why we need to embrace what my colleagues and I call the Modern Energy Minimum.</span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Imagine for a moment that the world set a goal of building an educated global workforce for the digital economy, but chose to measure success as everyone being able to read a complete sentence. Basic literacy is essential of course, but completely insufficient.</span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">We’re making a similar mistake with energy. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) is to ‘</span><a href="https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">ensure access</span></a><span data-contrast="auto"> to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.’ This is a worthy aspiration. Yet, the primary target for electricity is to reach 100% access at home, </span><a href="https://www.iea.org/articles/defining-energy-access-2020-methodology" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">defined</span></a><span data-contrast="auto"> as at least 50 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per person per year in rural areas (or 100 kWh for those living in cities).</span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Everyone needs basic electricity at home, but this target is insufficient in at least two ways. </span></p><ul><li data-leveltext="●" data-font="" data-listid="1" data-list-defn-props="{"335552541":1,"335559684":-2,"335559685":720,"335559991":360,"469769242":[8226],"469777803":"left","469777804":"●","469777815":"multilevel"}" aria-setsize="-1" data-aria-posinset="1" data-aria-level="1"><i><span data-contrast="auto">Our target is too low. </span></i><span data-contrast="auto">This level of electricity use can power a few light bulbs and maybe a small fan. It cannot power most household appliances nor even </span><a href="https://energyforgrowth.org/article/the-fridge-goes-viral-as-an-illustration-of-global-energy-inequality/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">a single refrigerator</span></a><span data-contrast="auto">. For comparison, my suburban American home with five people uses more than 50 kWh </span><i><span data-contrast="auto">per day</span></i><span data-contrast="auto">. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></li><li data-leveltext="●" data-font="" data-listid="1" data-list-defn-props="{"335552541":1,"335559684":-2,"335559685":720,"335559991":360,"469769242":[8226],"469777803":"left","469777804":"●","469777815":"multilevel"}" aria-setsize="-1" data-aria-posinset="2" data-aria-level="1"><i><span data-contrast="auto">Our target is too narrow. </span></i><span data-contrast="auto">About 70 percent of electricity is used not at home but in industry, commerce, agriculture and, increasingly, transportation. Electricity consumption in these non-residential sectors can drive higher incomes, job creation and national economic goals like industrialization. The UN measure doesn’t cover any of these energy uses.</span></li></ul><p><span data-contrast="auto">UN goals matter because they shape policies, affect public investment decisions and guide philanthropic efforts. Aiming too low shortchanges billions of people — and reinforces global energy inequality. </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Fortunately, a new global target proposed by the Energy for Growth Hub and the Rockefeller Foundation can provide that next step after basic access. The ‘</span><a href="https://energyforgrowth.org/article/modern-energy-minimum/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">Modern Energy Minimum</span></a><span data-contrast="auto">’ is a 1,000 kWh per person threshold that covers at least 300 kWh of electricity used in the home and an average of no less than 700 kWh in the wider economy. The Minimum provides a more ambitious vision that, when reached, would allow people to live more modern lives at home by having sufficient energy to run machines like computers and refrigerators that people in the wealthy world take for granted. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p class="p1"><figure class="flourish-wrapper"><div class="flourish-embed flourish-scatter" data-src="visualisation/16899157"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script></div><figcaption>Source: <a href="https://energyforgrowth.org/article/the-fridge-goes-viral-as-an-illustration-of-global-energy-inequality" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span class="s1">Energy for Growth Hub</span></a>, <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-electricity-generation?tab=table" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span class="s1">Our World in Data</span></a> • Data is from 2022.</figcaption></figure></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Just as importantly, the Modern Energy Minimum covers higher electricity use in the productive sectors of the economy. The idea here is to help relieve unreliable power as an obstacle to economic growth, which is sadly still </span><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304387823001876" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">a top constraint across Africa</span></a><span data-contrast="auto"> and many parts of Asia. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Employment is an eternal priority for every country on the planet. Getting every economy to at least the Modern Energy Minimum would unleash job creation and higher incomes, especially in energy-hungry countries like Nigeria, Pakistan or Tanzania where young people face a bleak labor market. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Indeed, electricity use and higher incomes are tightly related across time and geographies. The 100 kWh per capita level is correlated with less than $1 per day, while 1,000 kWh is equivalent to nearly $7 per day, a first rung of the global middle class. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">The Modern Energy Minimum is starting to catch on. The $10 billion philanthropy-led </span><a href="https://energyalliance.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet</span></a><span data-contrast="auto"> is using this metric as its primary eligibility criterion to determine where to invest. African energy ministers have </span><a href="https://www.mininfra.gov.rw/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=44024&token=c9d8a3e4e9ad4d22aa3c3b883055c9426760c584" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span data-contrast="none">endorsed the 1,000 kWh goal</span></a><span data-contrast="auto">, while more governments around the world are aligning their energy targets with their employment and industrial goals. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Reaching the Modern Energy Minimum for everyone on the planet is of course a much heavier lift than the current access target. It will take longer and require far more investment. But aiming higher will help to align energy goals with other employment and poverty reduction objectives — and thus live up to the original vision of the sustainable development goal.</span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">The benefits of aiming higher on energy use also extend to climate negotiations. The tensions over future carbon emissions are essentially about mistrust that rich-world climate goals could unfairly block development in poorer nations. Equating modern energy with a few light bulbs reinforces such fears. </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p><p><span data-contrast="auto">Revising global energy goals upward would establish a new baseline, underscoring the right to equitable development for all nations and help put the world on track to meet both our collective development and climate goals.</span><span data-ccp-props="{"201341983":0,"335559740":276}"> </span></p>
Why we need a more ambitious global energy target
by - Guest Author
February 26, 2024
Everyone needs modern energy to reach their full potential. Every economy needs low-cost reliable energy at scale to be competitive and to create well-paying jobs. That’s why the world has committed to achieving universal energy access. But this laudable global goal won’t deliver the expected benefits if we don’t update the way we track progress. Without a new approach, we will leave billions of people behind — and drive an even bigger wedge between rich and poor nations over climate policy. That’s why we need to embrace what my colleagues and I call the Modern Energy Minimum. Imagine for a moment that the world set a goal of building an educated global workforce for the digital economy, but chose to measure success as everyone being able to read a complete sentence. Basic literacy is essential of course, but completely insufficient. We’re making a similar mistake with energy. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG7) is to ‘ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all.’ This is a worthy aspiration. Yet, the primary target for electricity is to reach 100% access at home, defined as at least 50 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per person per year in rural areas (or 100 kWh for those living in cities). Everyone needs basic electricity at home, but this target is insufficient in at least two ways. Our target is too low. This level of electricity use can power a few light bulbs and maybe a small fan. It cannot power most household appliances nor even a single refrigerator. For comparison, my suburban American home with five people uses more than 50 kWh per day. Our target is too narrow. About 70 percent of electricity is used not at home but in industry, commerce, agriculture and, increasingly, transportation. Electricity consumption in these non-residential sectors can drive higher incomes, job creation and national economic goals like industrialization. The UN measure doesn’t cover any of these energy uses. UN goals matter because they shape policies, affect public investment decisions and guide philanthropic efforts. Aiming too low shortchanges billions of people — and reinforces global energy inequality. Fortunately, a new global target proposed by the Energy for Growth Hub and the Rockefeller Foundation can provide that next step after basic access. The ‘Modern Energy Minimum’ is a 1,000 kWh per person threshold that covers at least 300 kWh of electricity used in the home and an average of no less than 700 kWh in the wider economy. The Minimum provides a more ambitious vision that, when reached, would allow people to live more modern lives at home by having sufficient energy to run machines like computers and refrigerators that people in the wealthy world take for granted. Source: Energy for Growth Hub, Our World in Data • Data is from 2022. Just as importantly, the Modern Energy Minimum covers higher electricity use in the productive sectors of the economy. The idea here is to help relieve unreliable power as an obstacle to economic growth, which is sadly still a top constraint across Africa and many parts of Asia. Employment is an eternal priority for every country on the planet. Getting every economy to at least the Modern Energy Minimum would unleash job creation and higher incomes, especially in energy-hungry countries like Nigeria, Pakistan or Tanzania where young people face a bleak labor market. Indeed, electricity use and higher incomes are tightly related across time and geographies. The 100 kWh per capita level is correlated with less than $1 per day, while 1,000 kWh is equivalent to nearly $7 per day, a first rung of the global middle class. The Modern Energy Minimum is starting to catch on. The $10 billion philanthropy-led Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet is using this metric as its primary eligibility criterion to determine where to invest. African energy ministers have endorsed the 1,000 kWh goal, while more governments around the world are aligning their energy targets with their employment and industrial goals. Reaching the Modern Energy Minimum for everyone on the planet is of course a much heavier lift than the current access target. It will take longer and require far more investment. But aiming higher will help to align energy goals with other employment and poverty reduction objectives — and thus live up to the original vision of the sustainable development goal. The benefits of aiming higher on energy use also extend to climate negotiations. The tensions over future carbon emissions are essentially about mistrust that rich-world climate goals could unfairly block development in poorer nations. Equating modern energy with a few light bulbs reinforces such fears. Revising global energy goals upward would establish a new baseline, underscoring the right to equitable development for all nations and help put the world on track to meet both our collective development and climate goals.